- Hahn got 59% of the Asian American vote
- Villaraigosa got 64% of the Latino vote
- Parks got 54% of the African American vote
- 8% of the respondents said they were gay or lesbian
- Villaraigosa got 43% of the gay/lesbian vote
- 51% of respondents said they were liberal, 25% conservative, 24% moderate
- The gender split was 50-50 (unusual since women usually make up the voting majority)
- Villaraigosa had a +4 "gender gap" (35-31 male-female split), Hahn had a -2 (23-25)
- Villaraigosa won 825 precincts, Hertzberg 474 , Parks 185 and Hahn a mere 102 (but he placed second in more than all of the other three)
1200 Primary voters were asked as they left the polls:
If no candidate wins 51 % today, and there is a runoff election who would you vote for?
Hahn Villaraigosa Don't knowThe margin of error is +/2.8 percentage points. The numbers indicate precisely
City Total 29.7% 57.5% 12.8%
Group
White 30.4% 56.5% 13.0%
Black 33.3% 49.0% 17.6%
Latino 19.9% 74.2% 6.0%
Asian 51.1% 29.8% 19.1%
what a deep hole Hahn is in. He started off the campaign to the May 17 run-off election down 28 points! His only chance is to depress turnout so that his advantage with absentee voters can have a bigger impact on the final result. In the primary election, there were 408,069 votes cast (26% of the 1,474,186 registered voters in the City of Los Angeles), 104, 959 (25.72%) were absentee ballots. These votes were reported first and led to much consternation since Hahn led with 30%, Hertzberg had 26% and Villaraigosa trailed with 23%.
In the 2001 race, turnout was 33% in the primary and barely increased to 36% in the run-off. If we get the same effect this year we could expect a 28% voter turnout on May 17. Being generous and giving the Mayor a 15 point lead among absentee voters, Hahn would have to limit Villaraigosa's lead among election day voters to 5 percentage points to have any chance of peventing Antonio from becoming El Alcalde.
A
ReplyDelete