Showing posts with label Judi Dench. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judi Dench. Show all posts

Thursday, December 13, 2012

MOVIE REVIEW: Skyfall



The James Bond films starring Daniel Craig have instilled that 50-year-old movie franchise (the longest in movie-making history) with a new frisson of sexual energy and creative juices that have been surprising to many. The latest entry, Skyfall, is no exception. This is primarily due to the quality of the creative team brought to bear in its production. The director is Sam Mendes (Oscar winner for American Beauty) and Skyfall has the high-powered talents of Oscar winner Dame Judi Dench (Shakespeare in Love), Oscar winner Javier Bardem (No Country for Old Men) and Ralph Fiennes (Harry Potter films, The English Patient). Upcoming British actors like Naomie Harris (28 Days Later) and Ben Whishaw (Cloud Atlas) also have pivotal appearances. Even Sir Albert Finney (he’s not dead yet!) makes a significant contribution to the 3rd act.

The measure of the success of a Bond film is often about the quality of the villain, the beauty of the Bond girl(s) and the exoticism of the locales visited. Sometimes the Bond theme song can be the most memorable thing about the film (I defy you to tell me what Live and Let Die is about).

Skyfall has an excellent villain (played with just the right amount of quasi-homophobic creepiness to not go over the line by Bardem), an excellent theme song (by Adele of course) and some of the various locales visited by Bond are Istanbul, Shanghai, Macau and London.

One interesting aspect of the latest Bond films has been their willingness to explore the vulnerability and fallibility of James Bond himself. For example, in both Skyfall and Casino Royale Bond’s body undergoes substantial abuse (naked torture in the latter and a gun shot to the chest in the former) but Daniel Craig’s body is in clear and constant focus of the camera. Both clothed and unclothed, the camera’s eyes, and thus the audience is drawn to the sculpted nature of his frame. Even in a suit, the tight-fitting contours of Bond’s finely tailored suits leaves enough to the imagination to enthrall and excite. I’m not sure how much Bond’s straight male viewers react to another make being the subject of the camera’s gaze, but as a gay man this is something of a treat, especially in a mainstream, big budget Hollywood action movie ostensibly aimed at (and marketed to) pubescent boys. The general belief has always been that “women want to be with him and men want to be him” but does this still apply when James Bond’s antics can get you declared dead by your own government and your digging bullet fragments out of your own tautly muscled chest in front of a mirror? There is some clearly some subversion of the typical hero fantasy going on here.

One of Daniel Craig's best assets that he brings to the role of Bond are his eyes. Craig’s eyes are an almost unnatural cerulean blue, and the director uses all sorts of cinematographic tricks to get us to see them in various lights, exhibiting various emotions. Bond has the kind of eyes which can instantly suss out whether you are a threat to him or his mission and can also communicate to you that you better get out of his way because he has a license to kill. It almost is irrelevant to what Bond is doing, because just watching him doing it is so entertaining (and requires little or no cogitation by the audience).

That being said this time the story revolves around computer hacking of MI6 (the British equivalent of the Central Intelligence Agency) to obtain a list of secret NATO agents embedded in terrorist cells around the world, who will obviously be executed if they are exposed. The real attack is on whoever is at the head of an agency who has suffered such an egregious security failure, which in the case of MI6 is “M” (short for Minister, of course), played by Dench in every Bond film since Goldeneye in 1995 (the last 6 films). 

It becomes clear that the cyberterrorist is a former 00 agent named Silva, played by Bardem, who in a confrontation reveals his hatred for M because she traded his life away for 6 hostaged agents and when Silva tried to kill himself in captivity by activating a tooth with cynanide gas, the method did not kill him, but only grossly disfigured him. 

After another attack at the Houses of Parliament where M is testifying, Bond and M go off together to Scotland, to a safe house which turns out to be Bond's ancestral home, cleverly named "Skyfall."

I don't want to give a spoiler in this review so I will conclude the plot summary here. However, Skyfall is a well-directed, well-acted film with a very attractive lead who appears in almost every scene. The action is fast-paced and almost non-stop. The plot is irrelevant but relatively easy to follow if you decide to, and there is a somewhat surprising ending. You will leave the theater realizing that despite the fact the Bond franchise is 50 years old, it is still as fresh as ever and that they will be making these movies for a long, long time.

TitleSkyfall.
Director: Sam Mendes.
Running Time: 2 hours, 25 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for intense violent sequences throughout, some sexuality, language  and smoking.
Release Date: November 9, 2012.
Viewing Date: November 21, 2012.

Writing: B+.
Acting: A.
Visuals: A.
Impact: B+.

Overall Grade: A- (3.67/4.0).

Thursday, November 24, 2011

MOVIE REVIEW: J. Edgar





After a long break, I finally went and saw a movie. A group of co-workers planned an outing to see J. Edgar, the new movie directed and produced by Oscar-winner Clint Eastwood (Unforgiven, Million Dollar Baby, Mystic River) starring Leonardo Dicaprio, Naomi Watts, Judi Dench and Armie Hammer. The film is a biography about the life of J. Edgar Hoover, the longtime director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, and was written by openly gay Oscar-winner Dustin Lance Black (Milk).
The movie has had a mixed reception by critics (rated 40% on rottentomatoes.com) and has been excoriated by some LGBT reviewers. I don't disagree with the disappointed reviews but I do disagree with the intensity of the vitriol that is being heaped on the film.
At its core, J. Edgar is a film about the 50-year-old relationship between two men, J. Edgar Hoover (played by Dicaprio) and Clyde Tolson (played by Hammer), one of whom happened to be the most powerful man in the United States. Black's screenplay jumps haphazardly between different decades, covering the major events in Hoover's (and thus the FBI's) career. The primary event in Hoover's career was his investigation of the so-called Crime of the Century, the kidnapping (and murder) of Charles Lindbergh's infant son. Hoover was obsessed with solving the crime and the movie does a good job of depicting his support and encouragement of forensic science.


Hoover also had some curious relationships with the two most important women in his life, his mother, Anne Marie Hoover (played with brio by Dame Judi Dench), and his longtime secretary and personal assistant Helen Gandy (a thankless role played by Oscar nominee Naomi Watts). There's an incredibly chilling scene where Judi Dench makes it crystal clear that she has no interest in seeing her longtime bachelor of a son ever come out of the closet. Another enlightening scene is between a very young Hoover and Gandy have just began dating and Hoover asks her to marry him. She must realize that Hoover really has no interest in a conjugal relationship with a woman and instead she is interested in having a more enduring (professional) relationship, as his executive secretary.


The performances are the best part of the film, Dench is particularly good, as is Dicaprio. Hammer is easy on the eyes and the depiction of these two single men spending decades together at the #1 and #2 positions at the internal national police force despite a parade of more than half a dozen Presidents is quite compelling.


However, there are some bad characteristic of the film and these flaws most definitely outweigh its strong points. The first that comes to mind is the make-up. Dicaprio looks quite amazing physically as Hoover, but as the film jumps decades into the future they are forced to slather huge amounts of make-up on Hammer and Dicaprio, making Hammer particularly look like some kind of zombie. It doesn't help matters when Tolson has a stroke and spends the last half-hour of the film shaking a leaf. Hammer does a decent portrayal of the physical effects and Hoover's self-centeredness and paranoia are revealed when he starts to turn on the man who has shared his life with him. Even though the relationship lasts 50 years it is completely chaste since neither party really ever acknowledges the love they have for each other, except for one badly written and overly histrionic scene in which the two get physical (violently and romantically). I can understand that some reviewers felt these aspects of the film make it a disappointing exercise, but I would argue that it is still worth seeing, but go in knowing that it is not a masterpiece, but simply an affecting film.


Title: J. Edgar.
Director: Clint Eastwood.
Running Time: 2 hours, 17 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated R for brief strong language.
Release Date: November 11, 2011.
Viewing Date: November 15, 2011.


Plot: B+.
Acting: B+.
Visuals: B-.
Impact: B+.


Overall Grade: (3.167/4.0).

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

2007 Oscars Predictions

MadProfessah's Oscar nomination prediction accuracy rate in the Top 8 categories (Picture, Director, Actor, Actress, Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress, Original Screenplay and Adapted Screenplay) was an impressive 29 out of 40, or 72.5%. EW.com has a very cool Flash-powered game where you can enter EW's Oscars prediction contest. The awards ceremony will be hosted by Ellen Degeneres and broadcast next Sunday February 25th at 5pm from The Kodak Theater in the Hollywood section of Los Angeles.

Best Picture











Of course the major story here is what I like to call in my classes the Wideman question, i.e. "What's not here?" or "What's left out?" The answer is Dreamgirls! In my opinion, it was the Best Picture of the Year. Although I have seen a lot of movies in the last year, I only saw Babel and Letters from Iwo Jima in the last week but I can't say that I was overly impressed with either of these films enough to endorse their Best Picture worthiness.

If I go with the film that I enjoyed the most while watching it I would have to vote for Little Miss Sunshine though I must admit that I felt that there were moments of "Damn! That's good film making" while watching The Departed (for the intricacy of William Monahan's script), Babel (for the impact of Gustavo Santolalla's heart-tugging score) and The Queen (for the amazing Helen Mirren's transformation into Queen Elizabeth II). Sadly, I felt no transcendent moments while watching Letters from Iwo Jima ("Oscar voters snubbed Dreamgirls for this?" this weekend.

Anyway, many Oscar prognosticators have forecast a win by Babel for Best Picture on Sunday while others have gone for The Departed or Little Miss Sunshine. Anyway, Oscar ballots had to be in by Tuesday February 20th. Here are my picks:

SHOULD WIN: Little Miss Sunshine
WILL WIN: The Departed

Best Director

  • Clint Eastwood, Letters from Iwo Jima
  • Stephen Frears, The Queen
  • Alejandro González Iñárritu, Babel
  • Martin Scorsese, The Departed
  • Paul Greengrass, United 93

    SHOULD WIN: Stephen Frears, The Queen
    WILL WIN: Martin Scorsese, The Departed

Best Actress

  • Penelope Cruz, Volver
  • Judi Dench, Notes on a Scandal
  • Helen Mirren, The Queen
  • Meryl Streep, The Devil Wears Prada
  • Kate Winslet, Little Children

    SHOULD WIN: Helen Mirren, The Queen
    WILL WIN: Helen Mirren, The Queen

Best Actor

  • Leonardo Dicaprio, Blood Diamond
  • Ryan Gosling, Half Nelson
  • Peter O'Toole, Venus
  • Will Smith, The Pursuit of Happyness
  • Forrest Whitaker, The Last King of Scotland

    SHOULD WIN: Forrest Whitaker, The Last King of Scotland
    WILL WIN: Forrest Whitaker, The Last King of Scotland
Best Supporting Actress


  • Adriana Barraza, Babel
  • Cate Blanchett, Notes on a Scandal
  • Abigail Breslin, Little Miss Sunshine
  • Jennifer Hudson, Dreamgirls
  • Rinko Kicuchi, Babel

  • SHOULD WIN: Jennifer Hudson, Dreamgirls
    WILL WIN: Jennifer Hudson, Dreamgirls

Best Supporting Actor


  • Alan Arkin, Little Miss Sunshine
  • Jackie Early Haley, Little Children
  • Djimon Hounsou, Blood Diamond
  • Eddie Murphy, Dreamgirls
  • Mark Wahlberg, The Departed

    SHOULD WIN: Djimon Hounsou, Blood Diamond
    WILL WIN: Eddie Murphy, Dreamgirls

Best Original Screenplay

  • Guilllermo Arriaga, Babel
  • Iris Yamashita and Paul Haggis, Letters From Iwo Jima
  • Peter Morgan, The Queen
  • Michael Arndt, Little Miss Sunshine
  • Guillermo del Toro, Pan's Labyrinth

    SHOULD WIN: Guillermo del Toro, Pan's Labyrinth
    WILL WIN: Michael Arndt, Little Miss Sunshine

Best Adapted Screenplay

  • Sacha Baron Cohen and Anthony Hines and Peter Baynham and Dan Mazer and Todd Phillips, Borat Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
  • Todd Field and Tom Perrota, Little Children
  • Patrick Marber, Notes on a Scandal
  • Alfonso Cuarón and Timothy J. Sexton and David Arata and Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby, Children of Men
  • William Monahan, The Departed

    SHOULD WIN: William Monahan, The Departed
    WILL WIN: William Monahan, The Departed

Friday, February 16, 2007

REVIEW: Notes on a Scandal

Went to the local multiplex at Edwards Renaissance Theaters in Alhambra, CA and saw Notes on a Scandal this past weekend. The movie stars Academy Award winners Dame Judi Dench (Best Supporting Actress, Shakespeare in Love) and Cate Blanchett (Best Supporting Actress, The Aviator) in an adaptation of Zoë Heller's Booker Prize-nominated novel What Was She Thinking?: Notes on a Scandal by Patrick Marber (Academy Award nominee for Closer). These principals are all nominated for 2007 Oscars, as is Phillip Glass for his evocative score.

The story is of a toxic friendship between first-time art teacher Sheba Hart (played by Blanchett) and teaching veteran Barbara Covett (played by Dench) at a gritty, urban public school in North London. The plot follows a tragic personal mistake made by Sheba Hart to begin a sexual relationship with one of her 15-year old male students. The performances by the two leads are riveting to watch, and even the supporting roles are a pleasure to behold. The veteran British actor Bill Nighy (Love, Actually and more recently Pirates of the Caribbean) plays Sheba Hart's husband (and former professor). The young (born January 1, 1989) actor who plays Sheba Hart's romantic interest Steven Connolly who is an active and willing participant in the illicit affair is Andrew Simpson. He does an excellent job of portraying a boy who is mature enough to be involved with an adult much more than twice his age but not mature enough to know how to react when the situation becomes complicated. And things DO become complicated!

The movie has a visceral emotional impact and is compelling to watch, not unlike watching a car crash in slow motion involving people we care about but do not necessarily like. The audience knows what Sheba is doing is wrong, but Blanchett does an amazing job humanizing her character. Dench's character is such a repressed, self-deluded misanthrope that her job is more difficult: to get the audience to continue to watch and attempt to understand Barbara's motivation and actions without disgust. Both actresses succeed at their tasks magnificently. However, the end result is in the service of material which tends to sully the human spirit, not dignify it. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

REVIEW: B+.

LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin