Showing posts with label india. Show all posts
Showing posts with label india. Show all posts

Thursday, September 06, 2018

Queer Quote: Indian Supreme Court Invalidates Sodomy Law (Finally)


In a victory for tens of millions of LGBT individuals, the Supreme Court of India has finally invalidated India's colonial-era sodomy law, decriminalizing homosexuality and ruling that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is illegal in a near 500-page decision.

The battle to have Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code struck down has taken decades. In 2009, the Delhi High Court ruled the nation's sodomy law unconstitutional but the ruling was appealed to the highest court in the land even though the Indian Government agreed to abide by the decision in 2012. Then in 2013 that Court upheld the law in a shocking ruling that maintained the ban on "carnal intercourse against the order of nature." However, the Court agreed to re-hear that decision in 2014 and today's result follows that litigation.

The opinion is quite comprehensive and ends with some stunning conclusions:
(i) Section 377 of the Penal Code, in so far as it criminalises consensual
sexual conduct between adults of the same sex, is unconstitutional;
(ii) Members of the LGBT community are entitled, as all other citizens, to
the full range of constitutional rights including the liberties protected by
the Constitution
;
(iii) The choice of whom to partner, the ability to find fulfilment in sexual
intimacies and the right not to be subjected to discriminatory behaviour
are intrinsic to the constitutional protection of sexual orientation;
(iv) Members of the LGBT community are entitled to the benefit of an equal
citizenship, without discrimination, and to the equal protection of law;
and
(v) The decision in Koushal stands overruled.
This an amazing victory for sexual minorities! Note the highlighted section which indicates that the ruling goes far beyond just striking down sodomy laws (like 2003's Lawrence vs Texas).

Today's Queer Quote is from Jessica Stern of OutRight Action International (formerly the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission), who reacted to the ruling by saying, "The sodomy law that became the model everywhere, from Uganda to Singapore to the U.K. itself, premiered in India, becoming the confusing and dehumanizing standard replicated around the world [and] today’s historic outcome will reverberate across India and the world."

Woo hoo!

Wednesday, May 07, 2014

High Court of Australia Recognizes 3rd Sex Category (Neither Male Nor Female)


Interesting and important news out of Australia relating to LGBT people. Apparently the High Court of Australia ruled just over a month ago that a person does NOT have to be registered by the state as either male or female, but can be listed as a 3rd "non-specific" sex by the Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages.

Australia Broadcasting Corporation reported the news:
A Sydney resident who fought to be legally recognised as being of non-specific sex has hailed a High Court ruling that New South Wales laws do permit the registration of a category of sex other than male or female. 
Norrie was born male but had a sex change and now does not identify as specifically male or female. 
After a four-year legal battle, Norrie has won the right to be legally recognised as being of non-specific sex. 
Norrie, who had been quietly confident of winning the case, says the historic verdict is a big win for the wider transgender community. 
"I screamed a squeal of delight. Very loudly. It's very thrilling, very exciting," Norrie said. 
"I'm overjoyed that it has happened. It's important for people to have equal rights in society and if some people are granted the right to have their sex and certain benefits that go along with that, then why shouldn't everyone have that right? 
"Why should people be left out because they're not seen as male or female? They should be recognised as whatever they are and allowed to participate in society at an equal level."
This is a great development, and following a similar ruling by the India High Court in the last month is an indication that the idea that sex and gender are not binary phenomena is starting to gain traction among the international judiciary.

One reason why this is important for LGBT people is because the primary mechanism by which gender and sex roles are maintained and regulated is through the imputation of homosexuality. One primary example of where gender registrations are directly related to the rights and responsibilities of citizens is in the context of marriage. Thus the fact that more and more countries are recognizing
the true nature of gender and sex is exciting. 

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

India High Court To Reconsider Controversial Sodomy Ruling


Good news! The High Court of India has announced that a 5-member panel will consider its problematic December 2013 ruling that upheld India's ban on sodomy, criminalizing the sexual behavior of literally more than a hundred million people in the world's most populous democracy. The original ruling included some shockingly homophobic language, and unfortunately the two judges that signed that decision will be participating in the re-hearing.

Buzzfeed reports:
This is LGBTI rights advocates last chance to toss out the decision, which was a harsh blow after a 12-year litigation process. In January, a two-judge panel (which included one of the judges who issued the original ruling) rejected their first attempt to have the case reconsidered, what is known as a review petition. The current motion, known as a curative petition, still faces long odds, because the five-judge panel that will consider it includes the two judges who rejected the review petition. The other judges on the panel will be the three most senior judges on the court.
But the lawyers in this case got a major boost last week when a different two-judge Supreme Court panel issued a sweeping verdict recognizing broad rights for transgender people. Though the judges in the transgender rights case were careful to explicitly say they were not offering an opinion on the 377 case, their ruling reads almost like a point-by-point rebuttal to the ruling.
Recently the India High Court declared that transgender identity is a protected category.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

India High Court Recognizes Third Gender (Neither Male Nor Female)


Good news from India. A few months after the High Court upheld that country's archaic sodomy law, the court has now ruled that transgender citizens of India must be recognized as a separate third gender.

Reuters reports:
"Recognition of transgenders as a third gender is not a social or medical issue but a human rights issue," the Supreme Court's two-judge bench said in its ruling. 
"Transgenders are also citizens of India. The spirit of the constitution is to provide equal opportunity to every citizen to grow and attain their potential, irrespective of caste, religion or gender."
A person who is transgender does not identify with the gender stated on their birth certificate.
 
The court ruling - which came after hearing a petition filed by a group of transgenders demanding equal rights - recognized the community as a marginalized group and directed authorities to implement policies to improve their socio-economic status. 
The petitioners' lawyers said that this would mean that all identity documents, including a birth certificate, passport and driving license would recognize the third gender, along with male and female. 
The government will also have to allocate a certain percentage of public sector jobs, seats in schools and colleges to third gender applicants, said lawyer Sanjeev Bhatnagar. 
Due to their lack of access to jobs and education, many male-to-female transgenders - also known as "hijras" - are forced to work as sex workers or move around in organized groups begging or demanding money.
As Joe.My.God points out, India is the third country, after Nepal (2009) and Bangladesh (2013). Germany has become the first European country to recognize "undetermined" as the gender of new born children, but this policy is more about intersexuals than transgender individuals.

Sunday, March 30, 2014

CHESS: Anand Wins Right To Rematch With World Champ Carlsen In 2014


Former World Chess Champion Viswanathan Anand showed that he is still a force to be reckoned with by easily winning the 2014 FIDE Candidates tournament (with a  round to spare), earning him the right to a rematch for the World Chess Championship with the man who took his title last year, Magnus Carlsen.

Anand drew his 13th round game, and is currently at +3 (3 more wins than losses) for the tournament while his nearest competitors are at +0, which means there is no way they can exceed his point total regardless of the outcome of the 14th round.

44-year-old Anand will play 23-year-old Carlsen for the World Champion title in November 2014.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

India Supreme Court Rejects Petition To Review Sodomy Decision


The Supreme Court of India has issued a very short order denying a petition to review their surprising and much reviled decision upholding that country's anti-sodomy law that was released in December 2013.
Application for Oral hearing is rejected.We have gone through the Review Petitions and theconnected papers. We see no reason to interfere with the orderimpugned. The Review Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.
The brief order was signed by the same two Justices who wrote the original decision: H. L. Dattu and Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya.

Thursday, December 12, 2013

77 Countries Around The World Have Laws Banning Homosexuality


The disappointing news that India had recriminalized sodomy through a  court ruling yesterday has drawn attention to the fact that there are now 77 countries around the world that have laws banning homosexuality around the world. India's unfortunate action alone impacted over 1/6th of the world's population!

Business Insider has the full list of countries where LGB people are de facto (and de jure) criminals:
  1. Afghanistan
  2. Algeria
  3. Angola
  4. Antigua and Barbuda
  5. Bangladesh
  6. Barbados
  7. Belize
  8. Bhutan
  9. Botswana
  10. Brunei
  11. Burundi
  12. Cameroon
  13. Comoros
  14. Dominica
  15. Egypt
  16. Eritrea
  17. Ethiopia
  18. Gambia
  19. Ghana
  20. Grenada
  21. Guinea
  22. Guyana
  23. India
  24. Iran
  25. Jamaica
  26. Kenya
  27. Kiribati
  28. Kuwait
  29. Lebanon
  30. Liberia
  31. Libya
  32. Malawi
  33. Malaysia
  34. Maldives
  35. Mauritania
  36. Mauritius
  37. Morocco
  38. Mozambique
  39. Myanmar
  40. Namibia
  41. Nauru
  42. Nigeria
  43. Oman
  44. Pakistan
  45. Palau
  46. Papua New Guinea
  47. Qatar
  48. Samoa
  49. São Tomé and Principe
  50. Saudi Arabia
  51. Senegal
  52. Seychelles
  53. Sierra Leone
  54. Singapore
  55. Solomon Islands
  56. Somalia
  57. South Sudan
  58. Sri Lanka
  59. St Kitts & Nevis
  60. St Lucia
  61. St Vincent & the Grenadines
  62. Sudan
  63. Swaziland
  64. Syria
  65. Tanzania
  66. Togo
  67. Tonga
  68. Trinidad and Tobago
  69. Tunisia
  70. Turkmenistan
  71. Tuvalu
  72. Uganda
  73. United Arab Emirates
  74. Uzbekistan
  75. Yemen
  76. Zambia
  77. Zimbabwe


Hat/tip to Joe.My.God

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Excerpts From Shockingly Homophobic India Supreme Court Sodomy Ruling

The ruling yesterday (from a 2-judge panel) of the India Supreme Court that reinstated a criminal sodomy law in the 1.1 billion-person nation is reverberating around the world. Here are some excerpts from the wildly anachronistic decision that overruled a previous judgment striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code:
  • In its anxiety to protect the so-called rights of LGBT persons and to declare that Section 377 IPC violates the right to  privacy, autonomy and dignity, the High Court has extensively relied upon the judgments of  other jurisdictions.
  • The High Court is not at all right in observing that Section 377 IPC obstructs personality development of  homosexuals or affects  their  self-esteem because that observation is solely based on the reports prepared by the academicians
  • The impugned order (Delhi High Court order) does not discuss the  concept  of  "carnal
  • intercourse against the order of nature" and does not adequately show how the section violates the right to privacy. 
  • While reading down Section 377 IPC, the Division Bench of the High Court overlooked that a  miniscule fraction of the country's population constitute lesbians, gays, bisexuals or transgenders and in last more than 150 years less than 200 persons have been prosecuted (as  per  the  reported orders) for committing offence under Section 377  IPC. 
  • Unless a clear  constitutional violation is proved, this Court is not  empowered  to  strike  down  a  law merely by virtue of its falling into disuse or the perception of the society having changed as regards the legitimacy of its purpose and its need.
  • Abuse of power given by law does occur; but the validity of the law cannot be contested because of such an apprehension. Discretionary power is not necessarily a discriminatory power.
  • This Court has merely pronounced on the correctness of  the view taken by the Delhi High Court on the constitutionality of Section 377 IPC and found that the said section does not  suffer  from  any  constitutional  infirmity.
  • Notwithstanding this verdict, the competent legislature shall be free to consider the desirability and propriety of deleting Section  377  IPC from the statute book or amend the same as per  the suggestion made by the Attorney General.
"So-called rights"? This reads like outtakes from the much maligned 1986 decision of Bowers v Hardwick by the United States Supreme Court that upheld Georgia's criminal sodomy statute at the time and also mocked the idea of the basic dignity and constitutional protections of LGB persons.

A sad day for India and all those who believe in human rights around the world. What right does anyone have in criminalizing private, consensual sexual conduct between adults? How does their activity impact you?

BAD NEWS! India High Court Restores Sodomy Law, Criminalizing Homosexuality For 1.1 Billion People


Horrendous news! The India Supreme Court has overruled a lower court decision that had struck down the nation's law criminalizing homosexual activity in the world's second most populous country. Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code had been ruled unconstitutional by the New Delhi High Court in 2009 and the Indian government had agreed to accept the ruling, which meant that LGB people in the country no longer had to worry about being branded criminals by definition and subject to up to 10 years in prison. Religious groups took up the baton and appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.

However, the action by the Supreme Court overrules the lower court ruling and puts the issue at the feet of the India Parliament, which almost certainly will do nothing to change the law, which means that moving forward homosexuality has been effectively re-criminalized.
The top court said the 2009 Delhi High court order decriminalising homosexuality is constitutionally unsustainable as only the government can change a law. 
This means gay sex between consenting adults stays a criminal offence under Section 377, a British colonial era law banning "carnal intercourse against the order of nature", which had been struck down by the high court. The Supreme Court said there is "no constitutional infirmity" in that law. 
"It is surprising that the court which does judicial review on many issues has put the ball in the court of Parliament to decide on homosexuality," said additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising. "People expect the highest court of the land to protect their rights." 
The order is "a step backwards towards barbarism and medievalism," tweeted noted historian Ramachandra Guha. 
Gay rights NGO Naz foundation has said it will seek a review of the verdict.

Sad news from India. The first step to LGBT equality begins with decriminalizing sodomy. It was 10 years ago, in Lawrence vs Texas, that the United States Supreme Court ruled that all sodomy laws in the United States violated the constitution, saying that "The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime." Hopefully, the LGB community of India will not have to wait another 10 years before they can have their existence no longer demeaned by the laws of their country.

Friday, November 22, 2013

2013 CHENNAI WCC: Carlsen Wins Title By Defeating Anand 6.5-3.5!


The King is dead, long live the King! 22-year-old Magnus Carlsen of Norway has won the world chess championship match by defeating Viswanathan Anand 6.5 to 3.5. Carlsen won the 5th, 6th and 9th games in the 10-game match. The 9th game was the most exciting, with Anand apparently building up a huge attack and then suddenly blundering to lose the game.

Chess.com reports:
Magnus Carlsen won the 2013 World Chess Championship inChennai, India to become the 16th Undisputed World Champion of Chess. The 10th and last game of the match ended in a draw, and so the final score is 6.5-3.5 in favour of the Norwegian, who will celebrate his 23rd birthday in eight days from now.
Le roi est mort, vive le roi! Magnus Carlsen is the new World Champion of chess, and follows Viswanathan Anand's reign as undisputed world champion between 2007 and 2013. From the traditional lineage of chess players who won the crown in a match, Carlsen is the 16th champion after Wilhelm Steinitz, Emanuel Lasker, José Capablanca, Alexander Alekhine, Max Euwe, Mikhail Botvinnik, Vassily Smyslov, Mikhail Tal, Tigran Petrosjan, Boris Spassky, Robert Fischer, Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov, Vladimir Kramnik and Viswanathan Anand. If we include FIDE World Champions Alexander Khalifman, Ruslam Ponomariov, Rustam Kasimdzhanov and Veselin Topalov, Carlsen is the 20th Champion of the game.
Congratulations to Magnus on his victory!

Saturday, November 16, 2013

2013 CHENNAI WCC: Carlsen Leads Anand 4-2 At Halfway Point


The Word Chess Championships is currently going on in Chennai, India between Vishy Anand and Magnus Carlsen. The 22-year-old Carlsen is challenging the defending champion who is almost twice his age. The match is at the halfway point, and after beginning with four draws disaster has struck for Anand with two consecutive losses, one with black, and more ominously, one with white. (Generally among elite chess players having white and the right to play first is considered a tangible advantage.)

Here are the two games Anand has lost, starting with Game 6:

and Game 5


It is hard to see how Anand comes back from a 0-2 deficit. There are only 6 games left. Basically he would have to do to Carlsen what what Carlsen did to him. Presumably Carlsen will be trying to draw the remaining games, while Anand will be desperately trying to win (which may lead to another loss.)

It should be noted that Garry Kasparov also won the World Championship when he was 22, and dominated chess for the next decade. We may be seeing history repeat itself....

Friday, November 08, 2013

2013 CHENNAI: Anand-Carlsen World Chess Championship Starts Soon!

The highly anticipated world championship chess match between defending champion Viswanathan Anand and Magnus Carlsen is starting soon. 22-year-old Carlsen is the #1 rated player in the world, with an astonishing rating of 2862 while 43-year-old Anand has been at the top of the chess world for well over a decade, considered the world champion since 2007. Anand's current rating is 2779 and he is ranked #9 on the latest world chess rankings.

The 12-game match is happening in Chennai, India (the capital city of the state ofTamil Nadu) where Anand was born and raised. Most people, including former World Champion Garry Kasparov, believe that Carlsen will win, but everyone expects a tough, exciting contest.

CNBC reports:
"We have youthful energy and exuberance from one of the greatest chess prodigies of all time pitted against age and experience. Since I am considerably older than the defending world champion, there is a part of me who wouldn't mind seeing age and experience do OK," said [Wall Street financier Chris] Flowers, who is 56. 
Besides being so far apart in age, the competitors are also far apart in style. [Harvard Economics Professor Kenneth] Rogoff used a tennis analogy to compare the two. 
"Anand has the bigger serve, and Carlsen is more of the baseline, persistent player," he said. "Carlsen in particular just has an indomitable will to win. He aims for quiet positions where nothing seems to be going on and says, 'Well, nothing's going on, but you're going to lose.' Whereas Anand sparkles at everything, but particularly in very complicated positions, and he'll try to steer Carlsen into these messier things, where Carlsen maybe has less of an edge than in simpler positions."
Since I personally know Anand and used to play in similar tournaments with him decades ago I am rooting for him, but I think it will be hard for him to withstand the challenge from his youthful opponent.

You can follow the matches online at chennai2013.fide.com.

Thursday, January 17, 2013

FILM REVIEW: Life of Pi


The day after Christmas, the Other Half and I decided to see Ang Lee's adaptation of the Pullitzer-prize-winning book Life of Pi written by Yann Martel. Even though the film is released in 3-D and 2-D versions we saw it in the standard 2-D format because we basically believe that most of the time 3-D is nothing more than a gimmick to increase ticket prices.

Despite the fact that the plot of the book always struck me as too incredible to be even worth reading (a boy is stuck on a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean with a tiger!?) the movie is very engaging and an absolute visual feast.

It is true that the story involves teenager Pi Patel, played by newcomer Suraj Sharma, who is in a ship carrying his family's zoo animals to North America when there is an awful storm that ends up with Pi surviving on a lifeboat that has a Bengal tiger, a hyena and an orangutan on board. I know how ridiculous that sounds but somehow if you watch the movie it looks absolutely believable. The fact that it does so is testament to Lee's directorial prowess and story-telling strength.

The story is told in flashback by an older Pi Patel (played by amazing veteran Indian actor Irfan Khan) so we as the audience know that Pi survives his ordeal, although even with this knowledge the movie is suspenseful, because the situation he is in is so dangerous and harrowing. Both Sharma and Khan do an excellent job making Pi seem like a very real person and one that the audience can empathize and sympathize with. The real star of the film is Sharma, who astonishingly had never acted before, and only went to the audition for the part because he was accompanying his older brother! He is in the vast majority of the scenes of the movie and he is always able to carry the attention and interest of the viewer.

There's not much more I want to say about the plot except to say that the last 5-10 minutes of the movie are very important and place the events of the previous 2 hours into a perspective which depending on how you choose to interpret them, can greatly skew how you view the entire film.
Essentially, the audience has to make a choice which of two realities to believe in, and the author links those two choices to the choice of whether God exists (i.e. logically unexplainable, supernatural things--also known as miracles-- can happen) or whether God does not (and all events must be logically explainable).

Despite being a godless person myself, I found the movie impactful, and overall it is very entertaining piece of filmmaking.

TitleLife of Pi.
Director: Ang Lee.
Running Time: 2 hours, 7 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated PG for emotional thematic content throughout, and some scary action sequences and peril.
Release Date: November 21, 2012.
Viewing Date: December 26, 2012.

Writing: A-.
Acting: A.
Visuals: A.
Impact: A+.

Overall Grade: A (4.00/4.0).

Monday, April 02, 2012

Eye Candy: Rishi Idnani (3rd time!)




Rishi Idnani has appeared as Eye Candy here twice before ( June 29, 2009 and January 26, 2009). He is just one of the very many non-white models that have been featured here over the years. It's my contention that "hawt is hawt" regardless of ethnicity, skin color or race.

Any questions?

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

India Gov't Accepts Sodomy Legalization Ruling

The long strange story of India's sodomy law appears to be coming to a close with the demise of the colonial-era prohibition on gay male sexual acts appearing to be nigh. Today the Government of India clarified that it supports the previous decision by the Delhi High Court to decriminalize sodomy, despite a declaration before the Supreme Court last week that the Government felt that gay sex is "highly immoral" which was quickly officially denied.

The Associated Press has the story:
NEW DELHI (AP) — The Indian government Tuesday clarified to the Supreme Court that it accepts a recent ruling legalizing gay sex in the country.
A lawyer told the Supreme Court that the government would not challenge a 2009 order by the Delhi High Court striking down a colonial-era law that made gay sex a crime.
The order was appealed by conservative groups and the Supreme Court is now hearing opinions from those groups as well as gay rights activists.
The latest statement comes days after another government lawyer told the court that gay sex was "highly immoral" and should be banned. The government quickly denied that lawyer's statement, prompting confusion about its stance on the law.
On Tuesday, a Supreme Court justice asked the government's lawyers to file an affidavit to reconcile the two divergent positions heard in court. Neither lawyer explained Thursday's confusion.
The 2009 high court order had said that treating consensual gay sex between adults as a crime was a violation of fundamental rights protected by India's constitution.
If this decision gets confirmed it will be the single most significant advance in LGBT rights that will positively impact the most number of homosexuals in the world. India has a population which is estimated at 1.2 billion people.


Thursday, January 12, 2012

MOVIE REVIEW: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol


The Other Half and I were feeling like watching something not too serious for the last weekend of the year and since Brad Bird is one of our favorite directors (The Incredibles, The Iron Giant) we decided to go see his lastest film, even if it is the 4th installment in the Mission Impossible movies starring Tom Cruise.

Also influencing our decision to see the film was the fact that it was sporting a surprisingly positive rating on rottentomatoes.com of 93%, pretty high for your typical mindless action flick. The third one (2006's Mission Impossible III) had been produced and directed by JJ Abrams and had (somewhat ineffectively, in my estimation) combined numerous action sequences with intricate, highly charged emotional scenes between Cruise and Philip Seymour Hoffman.

This fourth outing stars Cruise again (now 49 years old but astonishingly still able to maintain his credibility as male action hero) as well as Simon Pegg (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz), Paula Patton (Déjà Vu, Precious) and Jeremy Renner (The Hurt Locker, The Town). (Spoiler alert! Tom Wilkinson has a literally short-lived cameo as the Secretary of Defense and Anil Kapoor (the TV host in Slumdog Millionaire) shows up late in the film as comically randy billionaire.) Looks like actor Josh Holloway (Sawyer on Lost) is starting to get some work in movies although his part is also pretty small.

I would talk about the plot of the movie but it is typically simultaneously indecipherable and non-sensical. What is most important in this kind of movie are the shooting locations, the fancy gadgets and the overall production values and on this level Mission Impossible IV does not disappoint.

The movie begins in Budapest, Hungary (the second film I have seen in little over a month to do so: Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy also begins with a pivotal scene in this apparently gorgeous city) and then movies on to The Kremlin in Moscow, then the tallest building in the world (Burj Khalifa), located in the United Arab Emirates and then ends in Mumbai, India. It really is quite thrilling to get a close-up look at the interior an exterior of the Burj Khalifa, as well as the view from 130 stories.

There are all sorts of fanciful gadgets used by the "Impossible Mission Force," even the much-maligned, (frankly ridiculous) full-face masks introduced in the very first edition of the series which basically allows anyone's face to appear on anyone else's body (perfect facial impersonation). However, here the writer (or director) do themselves a favor by making fun of the face masks, while still deploying them in a way which forwards "the plot."

The production values are frankly top-notch throughout and though the film is well-over 2-hours it never seems to slow down and due to the penchant for killing characters played by major actors the viewer really does have a sense that perhaps this time the bad guys will actually win and that any member of the team can be killed at just about any moment.

Except for Tom of course. After all, there is the inevitable Mission Impossible V  to look forward to!

Title: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol.
Director: Brad Bird.
Running Time: 2 hours, 13 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense action and violence.
Release Date: December 21, 2011.
Viewing Date: December 30, 2011.

 Plot: C.
Acting: A-.
Visuals: A.
Impact: A-.

Overall Grade: B+ (3.33/4.0).

Monday, January 09, 2012

Eye Candy: Ajay Shah




Ajay Shah is a 6-foot-1inch, 175-pound, 27-year-old model of East Indian descent who has his own Model Mayhem profile and has been featured on the ManWatch blog. I think he is not the first smoking hot model of South Asian descent to be features as Eye Candy on this blog and he certainly won't be the last! Hawt is hawt...

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Anand Regains World #1 Chess Rating

Despite finishing second in the latest super grandmaster tournament in Bilbao, Spain, world champion Viswanathan Anand has regained the World #1 ranking he had previously lost to Norweggian wunderkind Magnus Carlsen.


Former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik finished first, with Anand second, Carlsen 3rd and Shirov fourth, at the 2010 Bilbao Masters Final; the chess tournament had the highest average participant rating of all time.

Carlsen has had a bit of a dip lately, losing rating points to fall to 2802, while Anand's rating is now at 2803. They are the only active players to be above 2800 rating. A Super grandmaster (unofficial title) rating is considered to be around 2650.

Saturday, July 31, 2010

BOOK REVIEW: Aravind Adiga's THE WHITE TIGER

Aravind Adiga's The White Tiger won the 2008 Man Booker Prize, the most prestigious individual book prize in English (only writers from Commonwealth countries are eligible).

I got the book for Christmas in 2008 and finally read it over my summer vacation in August 2009.

The White Tiger is a book about contemporary Indian life, told in a very readable, darkly comic style by a prose magician.

It is one of the few Booker prizewinners that can easily be read in an afternoon. (Or even read at all. I still have a copy of Salman Rushdie's Midnight Children, barely begun, no my bookshelf.) Having been to India myself in the last 5 years I am always curious to see depictions of the country in film and novels. This was one of (not the most important) things which made Danny Boyle's Slumdog Millionaire (read my review here) so enjoyable to me. I'm not saying if it wasn't set in India the movie would not have been interesting to me; I'm saying that the added India element enriches the work in my eyes, thanks to my interest in the subject.

Anyway, Aviga's work is written in the form of a series of letters to the Premier of China (The White Tiger of the book's title) and follows the adventures of Balram Halwai, a perfectly ordinary Indian man from a typical Indian village who happens to be the narrator of the book--and a murderer.

Adiga has harsh social commentary on almost every aspect of Indian society, from elections to malls to religion (so many gods, so little time!) which has made the book somewhat controversial in some circles, presumably even more so now that it has been awarded the Booker.

In the end, though, there's something not quite satisfying about The White Tiger. After you finish it, you feel like you are ready to read another book, about half an hour later.

Title: The White Tiger
Author: Aravind Aviga
Publisher: Free Press
Date: October 14, 2008.
Length: 352 pages.

PLOT: B.
IMAGERY: B+.
IMPACT: B-.
WRITING: A-.

OVERALL GRADE: B/B+.

LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin