Showing posts with label movies 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies 2012. Show all posts

Thursday, February 28, 2013

My Top 10 Favorite Films Seen in 2012

Below is a list of my Top 10 films that I saw in 2012. As it turns out, my favorite was actually released in 2011 and was honored with the 2012 Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film. I had thought about changing my list to include only films that were released in 2012, but that also seems artificial, since one can consume films in many different ways and often I may not have seen a film released in one year until much later (look at all the films I saw from the 1970s in 2012).

Anyway, here is my list of my favorite films seen in 2012
  1. A Separation. This was the best film I saw all year. Even though it was technically a 2011 release and elegible for the 2012 Oscars, I still think it should be on the list. What's so amazing about the film is that it is about such a simple subject: the problems of how to take care of an elderly family by a working couple. The twist is that the movie is set in Tehran, Iran so we see what seems like a typical domestic situation played out in a completely foreign (to American eyes) landscape. The differences in religion, social mores, legal system do not detract from the universal themes that A Separation depicts.
  2. Argo. Bizarrely, both of the top 2 films of 2012 that I saw are set in Iran. The 2013 Oscar for Best Picture deservedly went to Ben Affleck's third feature film, about the little-known true story set around the time of a foreign affairs crisis for the United States. It is an exceedingly well-directed and well-written movie. What comes to mind (and I have seen the film twice so far) is how suspenseful the film is despite the audience knowing how the story ends. I was on the edge of my seat both times I saw the film, which is a testament to the virtuouso level of film-making. And it is also quite funny, by the far the most enjoyable filmI watched all year long.
  3. Bully. Bully is decidedly not an enjoyable film, but it is an important one. I saw it on a plane, not in a movie theater, which is why it is the one movie on the list which does not have an official blog review. However, it still left quite an impression. Bully is about the epidemic of violence, both emotional and physical which kids face in schools every day and tells the story of how the adults and institutions which surround them fail to protect them, often leading to heartbreaking results. The most prominent reasons for bullying are usually around gender expression/sexual orientation but the film makes it clear that the seeds of bullying are really about punishing any deviations from what is perceived as "normal" by the majority and the marginalization of the Other. It is a powerful, emotionally draining experience to watch.
  4. Prometheus. This is a pre-quel to Aliens, one of the classic science fiction movies of all times, directed by the great Ridley Scott. It stars an incredible cast of Charlize Theron, Michael Fassbender, Idris Elba, and Noomi Rapace and looks incredible (it was nominated for Best Visual Effects). Sadly, the emotional impact of the film is not as high as the other films in the Alien franchise, primarily due to a somewhat muddled and non-sensical script. Regardless, it is very watchable and the best sci-fi related visual entertainment of the year.
  5. Django Unchained. The second movie in Tarantino's "Unspeakable" series of films (following on the heels of Inglourious Basterds about the Holocaust) has the audacity to deal with not only slavery, a difficult subject for a white artist to address, but does so using Tarntino's signature humor and over-the-top violence. Django Unchained had a somewhat mixed critical reaction, but audiences loved it (94% on rottentomatoes.com), especially black audiences. Even the Academy recognized the film with two Oscars in very important categories, Best Supporting Actor and Best Original Screenplay. And, hey, it features full-frontal nudity of Jamie Foxx, so what's not to like?
  6. Cloud Atlas. This is another film in which the critics and myself had very different reactions to a film. Cloud Atlas is the latest film from the controversial Wachowski Siblings, the creative team behind The Matrix, and based on an award-winning novel. It is definitely not without flaws, but there are visual sequences in this film that will stick with me for years and again it features a celebrated cast, helmed by Oscar-winners Tom Hanks and Halle Berry in multiple, gender-bending roles.
  7. Looper. It's always a delight when one goes to see a movie with low (or no) expectations and has them overwhelmingly exceeded. Looper is primarily the vision of one person, Rian Johnson, and is another one of those time-travelling brain twister. Most well-known for the curious make-up job inflicted upon Joseph Gordon-Levitt to make him believable look like Bruce Willis earlier self, Looper will definitely make you think and marvel how a creative and frugal director can tell a big story on a small budget.
  8. Lincoln. Now Steve Spielberg is known for the Oscar history it made as the biggest Oscar loser of the year, one of the biggest of all time (10 losses out of 12 nominations) and for the historic third Best Actor statuette picked up by it's star Daniel Day-Lewis. It is a good movie, and a memorable one, but it is not an overly enjoyable one. There's something oddly off-putting about the film, which is something one does not usually say about a film directed by Spielberg, whose ability to manipulate his audience's emotions is legendary.
  9. The Dark Knight Rises. My favorite filmmaker is Christopher Nolan, and I was very happy that he was able to follow one of the largest box-office successes of the last decade (The Dark Knight) with a sequel that completed the Batman trilogy on a high note. The main word that comes to mind with this film is "quality" or "top-notch." The cast is extraordinary: Marion Cotillard, Christin Bale, Morgan Freeman, Anne Hathaway, Michael Caine, Gary Oldman, Tom Hardy and Joseph Gordon-Levitt. The opening sequence alone is worth the price of admission.
  10. Life of Pi. Ang Lee's masterful film adaptation of an impossible-to-adapt Booker prize-winning novel was the most celebrated film at the 2013 Oscars, winning 4 out of 11 nominations. It is one of the most visually stunning films of the year, and the only reason it is so low on my list is that the overall message of the film, which is a somewhat convoluted argument for the existence of God is disappointing, but I can still appreciate the film as a beautiful and impressive work of art.
2012 was a pretty good for movies. I hope that 2013 turns out to be just as good!

Monday, February 25, 2013

2013 OSCARS: The Winners




I only correctly predicted 5 of the Top 8 and 14 of 24, one of my lowest totals in years.

Best motion picture
  • Argo, Grant Heslov, Ben Affleck and George Clooney, Producers
Achievement in directing
  • Life of Pi, Ang Lee
Performance by an actor in a leading role
  • Daniel Day-Lewis in Lincoln
Performance by an actress in a leading role
  • Jennifer Lawrence in Silver Linings Playbook
Performance by an actor in a supporting role
  • Christoph Waltz, Django Unchained
Performance by an actress in a supporting role
  • Anne Hathaway, in Les Misérables
Best animated feature film of the year
  • Brave, Mark Andrews and Brenda Chapman
Best foreign language film of the year
  • Amour, Austria
Adapted screenplay
  • Argo, Screenplay by Chris Terrio
Original screenplay
  • Django Unchained, Written by Quentin Tarantino
Achievement in cinematography
  • Life of Pi, Claudio Miranda
Achievement in film editing
  • Argo, William Goldenberg
Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original score)
  • Life of Pi, Mychael Danna
Achievement in costume design
  • Anna Karenina, Jacqueline Durran
Best documentary feature
  • Searching for Sugar Man, Malik Benjelloul, Simon Chinn
Best documentary short subject
  • Inocente, Sean Fine and Andrea Nix Fine
Achievement in makeup and hairstyling
  • Les Misérables, Lisa Westcott and Julie Dartnell
Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original song)
  • Skyfall from Skyfall, Music and Lyric by Adele Adkins and Paul Epworth
Achievement in production design
  • Lincoln, Production Design: Rick Carter; Set Decoration: Jim Erickson
Best animated short film
  • Paperman, John Kahrs
Best live action short film
  • Curfew, Shawn Christensen
Achievement in sound editing (tie!)
  • Skyfall, Per Hallberg and Karen Baker Landers
  • Zero Dark Thirty, Paul N.J. Ottosson
Achievement in sound mixing
  • Les Misérables, Andy Nelson, Mark Paterson and Simon Hayes
Achievement in visual effects
  • Life of Pi, Bill Westenhofer, Guillaume Rocheron, Erik-Jan De Boer and Donald R. Elliott

Sunday, February 24, 2013

2013 OSCARS: Predictions, Mine and Nate Silver's







Sunday is the day of the Gay Super Bowl, i.e. the 85th Annual Academy Awards ceremony. I have previously made my predictions for this year's winners of the Top 8 categories, like I have done every year since 2007:

In 2011, I predicted 15 of 24 correctly (7 of the Top 8).
In 2010, I predicted 17 of 24 correctly (7 of the Top 8).
In 2009, I predicted 20 of 24 correctly (8 of the Top 8).
In 2008, I predicted 8 of the Top 8 categories correctly.
In 2007, I predicted 7 of the Top 8 categories correctly.

Here are my predictions for all 24 categories (with 2nd choices) for the 2013 Oscars:
Best Picture: Argo (2nd: Lincoln) 
Director: Steven Spielberg (2nd: David O. Russell) 
Original Screenplay: Django Unchained (2nd: Amour) 
Adapted Screenplay: Lincoln (2nd: Argo) 
Actor: Daniel Day-Lewis  (2nd: Bradley Cooper ) 
Actress: Jennifer Lawrence (2nd: Jessica Chastain) 
Supporting Actress: Anne Hathaway (2nd: Amy Adams) 
Supporting Actor: Robert De Niro (2nd: Tommy Lee Jones) 
Editing: Argo (2nd: Zero Dark Thirty) 
Production Design: Anna Karenina (2nd: Life of Pi) 
Sound Mixing: Les Miserables (2nd: Life of Pi) 
Sound Editing: Life of Pi (2nd: Django Unchained) 
Cinematography: Life of Pi (2nd: Skyfall) 
Costume Design: Anna Karenina (2nd: Lincoln) 
Documentary: Searching for Sugarman  (2nd: How To Survive A Plague) 
Foreign Language: Amour (2nd: A Royal Affair) 
Animated Film: Frankenweenie (2nd: Brave) 
Makeup: The HobbitScore: Lincoln (2nd: Life of Pi) 
Song: "Skyfall" (from Skyfall) (2nd: "Pi's Lullaby") 
Visual Effects: Life of Pi (2nd: Prometheus) 
Animated Short: Maggie Simpson in The Longest Daycare (2nd: Paperman) 
Live Action Short: Buzkashi Boys (2nd: Asad)  
Documentary Short: Inocente (2nd: Redemption)

Predictions Guru Nate Silver has gotten into the game, somewhat, by predicting the Top 6 categories. His choices are Argo, Spielberg, Lawrence, Day-Lewis, Hathaway, Jones.

I generally agree with him on his predictions, but the hardest category to pick is Best Supporting Actor this year (usually the first acting award given out of the night) and I think De Niro is going to pull a surprise win. And really there are 8 top categories so it is a bit of a cop-out to not do the screenplay categories. The adapted screenplay category is particularly tough this year, basically a coin flip between Argo and Lincoln while Original Screenplay is basically anyone's game (except Beasts of the Southern Wild--they have zero chance of winning any Oscars).

We'll know within several hours how well I did this year. I suspect my results in the Top 8 will not be as high as I am accustomed.

Sunday, February 10, 2013

2013 Oscars: My Predictions


Here are my current predictions for the 2013 Oscars, which will be given out exactly two weeks from today. I think that in the end the Academy will vote for Best Picture the movie they enjoyed the most sitting through, which is Argo and not the movie they have been bludgeoned into thinking should be the best picture, i.e. Lincoln. The real question is since they can not vote for Affleck for Director, will they give it to a previous winner (like Steven Spielberg or Ang Lee), or will they try to anoint someone new who has been creating deserving work for years, like David O. Russell or Michael Haneke?

The toughest categories in the big 8 are Best Director, Best Supporting Actor, Best Adapted Screenplay. And they are all basically related.

Best Picture
Amour
Argo
Beasts of the Southern Wild
Django Unchained
Les Misérables
Life of Pi
Lincoln
Silver Linings Playbook
Zero Dark Thirty

Best Director
SHOULD WIN: David O. Russell, Silver Linings Playbook
WILL WIN: Steven Spielberg, Lincoln

Best Actress
SHOULD WIN: Jennifer Lawrence, Silver Linings Playbook
WILL WIN: Jennifer Lawrence, Silver Linings Playbook

Best Actor
  • Bradley Cooper, Silver Linings Playbook
  • Daniel Day-Lewis, Lincoln
  • Denzel Washington, Flight
  • Hugh Jackman, Les Misérables
  • Joaquin Phoenix, The Master
SHOULD WIN: Daniel Day-LewisLincoln
WILL WIN: Daniel Day-Lewis, Lincoln

Best Supporting Actress
SHOULD WIN: Anne Hathaway, Les Miserables
WILL WIN: Anne Hathaway, Les Miserables

Best Supporting Actor
SHOULD WIN: Robert De Niro, Silver Linings Playbook
WILL WIN:  Robert De Niro, Silver Linings Playbook

Best Original Screenplay
SHOULD WIN: Django UnchainedQuentin Tarantino
WILL WIN:  Moonrise Kingdom, Wes Anderson and Roman Coppola

Best Adapted Screenplay
SHOULD WIN: Life of Pi, David Magee
WILL WIN: Lincoln, Tony Kushner or ArgoChris Terrio

Oscar Totals: 
Lincoln (6) followed by Argo (4) and  Life of Pi (4)

Thursday, February 07, 2013

FILM REVIEW: Beasts of the Southern Wild


Beast of the Southern Wild is the Cinderella movie of the 2013 Oscar season, stunning critics and fans alike by getting four Academy Award nominations, in the most prominent categories of Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actress and Best Adapted Screenplay. The star of the film has the impossible name of Quvenzhané Wallis and at age 9 she has become the youngest person ever nominated in the Best Actress category.

Wallis plays Hushpuppy, the daughter of Wink (played by Dwight Henry) who both live in decrepit squalor in a low-lying land they call "the Bathtub," a section of the world cut off from the rest of society (or Louisiana!) by a levee.

The Other Half and I saw the film when it opened in Washington, D.C. for a secondary run at the E Street Landmark Cinemas while he was in town for the second inauguration of Barack Obama.

It was good to see the film on the big screen and I did not know much about the film except that it starred a very young African-American girl who must have given an amazing performance because it got Oscar-nominated. A lot of the glowing reviews mentioned how "creative," "original"and "magical" but what they do not really describe is how experimental a film it is. First-time director Zeitlin defies numerous standard movie conventions (like centering his film around a juvenile child of color, eschewing dialogue and narrative flow and casting "real-looking" people in every role). Although I suppose he must be commended for making a film for under $2 million that has been able to garner such visceral reactions from such a wide swath of critics.

My immediate reaction among seeing the film was mostly disbelief. I couldn't believe that there were literally hundreds of Academy members who felt that Wallis gave one of the best acting performances of the year. It is absolutely not clear to me, what she is doing is actually acting per se. First off, there is not that much dialogue in the film that she has to say while on camera. Most of what she says is presented as dreamy, mystical voice-over. (Note, I am not saying that voice-acting is not acting, but no actor in an an animated film has ever been nominated for their voice-over performance, and there's a reason for that.)

Secondly, even though the story is presented as an urban(?) fantasy it is still very difficult to watch. Basically, Wallis is running around the screen in frankly dangerous surroundings filled with trash and farm animals, with almost no adult supervision, clearly representing the titular Beast. However, in my eyes, Hushpuppy runs dangerously close to representing a "pickaninny" character. One of the first scenes in the film is of an entire chicken being dropped on a grill and then presented to Hushpuppy to eat, after a bell is rung to let her know that it is "time to feed."

The plot is mainly centered around Hushpuppy (and the audience) discovering that her father has what looks like a terminal illness and how the two of them deal with that fact and the effects of extreme weather changes (melting of the polar ice caps) which release dangerous looking Beasts (called "Aurochs") into the world and flood the Bathtub, displacing the destitute people from their already desperate living situations.

The only good thing that I can say about the movie is that it is thankfully short. The words I would use to describe it are "confusing," "disappointing" and "strange."

TitleBeast of the Southern Wild.
Director: Benh Zeitlin.
Running Time: 1 hour, 31 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for thematic material including child imperilment, some disturbing images, language, and brief sensuality.
Release Date: June 27, 2012.
Viewing Date: January 20, 2013.

Writing: C.
Acting: C.
Visuals: B+.
Impact: B-.

Overall Grade: B-/C+ (2.50/4.0).

Tuesday, February 05, 2013

FILM REVIEW: Zero Dark Thirty


This movie has been controversial ever since it was announced that the Oscar-winning creative team behind The Hurt Locker, director Kathryn Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal was going to follow up their film that won the 2009 Best Picture Academy Award with a movie about the hunt for Osama bin Laden.

That movie is Zero Dark Thirty, and it has only become more controversial, not less, since it moved from being words on a page to images on the screen. The primary controversy (although there are many!) is based on the characterization of the film as  "journalistic" combined with the inclusion of scenes of torture during "enhanced" interrogations which occur during the hunt to find bin Laden's location.

To me, the question of whether the film is trying to say that information garnered from torture led to the capture of bin Laden is a Rohrshach test. Different people viewing the film come to different conclusions about that that aspect of the film. The filmmakers itself attempted to dispute the characterization of the film's message as pro-torture saying that they personally were against "inhumane treatment of any kind" but that torture was as aspect of the story that the film could not ignore.

It's the second question, of the film depicting itself as a sort of docu-drama or stylized portrayal of the actual incidents that occurred during the decade-long fight to find bin Laden that I think is even more problematic for Zero Dark Thirty. The film does things like put titles on the screen like "Black CIA Site" when it is depicting locations and as it goes on, it depicts some of the large successful terrorist attacks that have happened since 9-11 in other countries, with the specific dates on the screen (like the July 7, 2005 London bombings, for example). This is all intended to give the film a sense of verisimilitude, but in the end it is a movie, despite the creator's attempt to describe it as 'journalistic" (i.e. depicting the truth). We, the audience, do know (from other sources) that many of the events depicted in the film actually happened, but we do not know whether all the events in the film actually happened. Boal has written (and been nominated for) an  Original Screenplay, which means Zero Dark Thirty is a work of fiction. But the intense negative reaction to the movie from some quarters (including statements from the acting head of the CIA itself and the current Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee) seem to forget that fact.

There's no question that these controversies had an impact on the reception for the film at the Oscars (but, tellingly, not the box-office). Zero Dark Thirty received only 5 Oscar nominations, with a clear rebuke to Bigelow by not including her on the list of Best Directors (even though she is one of the very few women to ever have been nominated and the only woman to have ever won) although the Academy still recognized the searing performance by Jessica Chastain at the heart of the film with a Best Actress nomination. The Hurt Locker was the lowest-grossing film ever to win Best Picture; Zero Dark Thirty has already grossed 4 times that amount and the Oscar ceremony hasn't even happened yet.

Chastain is a revelation in Zero Dark Thirty. She had previously received a Best Supporting Actress nomination for her role in The Help as a helpless Southern Belle and also was noticeable in Tree of Life as the troubled wife and mother. However, in Zero Dark Thirty Chastain plays Maya, a CIA operative who was recruited into The Company out of high school(!) and has had one single job for her entire career: hunt down bin Laden. Chastain plays Maya as a very driven, forceful and somewhat obsessive person who is willing to do whatever it takes to sift through the vast haystacks of intelligence the CIA has on various terrorists in order to find the few golden nuggets of truth which can indicate where bin Laden is hiding.

We (the audience) see this from the very first scene in the movie where we see Chastain appear in a very business-like women's suit to attend an interrogation being conducted by her superior played by Jason Clarke. The interview quickly turns into a torture session as the bedraggled, visibly wounded prisoner is stripped naked, waterboarded and assaulted (verbally, physically and emotionally). The fact that Chastain does not blanch or complain or protest and even participates in a small way (i.e. by bringing the water bucket they use to pour over the prisoner's face to make him think he's drowning) immediately tells us: "This girl is a bad-ass!"

Bigelow must have been amazed to discover (just as we the audience is) that the key person at the center of the "the Greatest Manhunt in History" was a strong-willed woman. It makes for a great story as we watch Maya battle in a male-dominated environment to keep the focus on bin Laden when her superiors want to assign her to other activities when politics and priorities at the agency change. Interestingly, despite spending most of the time in various Muslim countries like Pakistan the film shows that Maya has several other female colleagues on staff, but that it's really her personality and disposition which make her a lone wolf and singularly focussed on the hunt for bin Laden.

Overall, the film is very well-directed and confidently constructed. Despite telling a story that the every audience member knows the ending to it is very compelling and suspenseful and never waivers in its grip on the viewer. The depictions of torture are very difficult to watch (as they should be) and your reaction to that may overwhelm you overall evaluation of the film. It also contains one of the best performances (in one of the best roles) by a woman on film in 2012. My personal reaction to the film is that I was not as emotionally invested or impacted by it as I expected to be. Every American was (and is) impacted by the death of Osama bin Laden, of course, so one would think that a film depicting the successful hunt to find and kill him would be cathartic However, just like Maya, by the end of the film I did not feel bliss or relief at (re)living the experience but somewhat drained and tired. That may have been Bigelow's intent, and if so, she succeeded masterfully. But the exhaustion I felt at the end of the movie was not one that I relate to having expended energy in the pursuit of some useful goal or pleasurable activity but more like the conclusion of a weighty task. Is that really how one wants to feel after watching a movie?

Title: Zero Dark Thirty.
Director: Kathryn Bigelow.
Running Time: 2 hours, 37 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated R for strong violence including brutal disturbing images, and for language.
Release Date: December 19, 2012.
Viewing Date: January 5, 2013.

Writing: A-.
Acting: A+.
Visuals: A.
Impact: A-.

Overall Grade: A/A- (3.917/4.0).

Monday, January 21, 2013

FILM REVIEW: Silver Linings Playbook



One of the most unusual movies of the year is David O. Russell's Silver Linings Playbook starring Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Lawrence as two damaged people who are desperately trying to connect emotionally with another person. Cooper plays Pat Solatano, Jr. who at the beginning of the film is seen being released from a mental institution by his mom, Debbie Solatano (played by the veteran Australian actress Jackie Weaver). Pat asks his mom to give a friend named Danny (played by Chris Tucker) that he met during his stay at the mental institution history a ride home but soon we discover that Pat is actually trying to use his mom as an accomplice to help Danny escape! This is just the first sign that something is "not quite right" with Pat.

Soon we have even more evidence that multiple members of the Solatano household are "not quite right" when we meet Pat's Dad, Pat Solatano, Sr (played by 2-time Oscar winner Robert De Niro) who is absolutely obsessed with the Philadelphia Eagles because his primary source of income is acting as a bookie for bets on football. We (the audience) obtain this information because Debbie tells Pat before they enter the house that his dad is doing this and admonishes him not to bring it up when he meets his dad for the first time in 9 months. The first thing Pat does when he walks in the house is mention the bookie thing, causing Pat Senior to remonstrate with his wife for revealing this information. Pat Senior has his own quirks as well, not only does he basically make his living from illegal sports gambling but he also has a curious delusion that if he does certain things it will improve the chances of his team winning. This goes well beyond the typical magical thinking or superstitions of many sports fans because Pat Senior insists that the actions of other people around him can also impact the "luck" his favored team will have.

Pat gets invited to his best friend Ronnie's house for dinner and there he meets a girl named Tiffany Maxwell who is Ronnie's sister-in-law and a recovering sex addict and recent widow. The dinner is a pretty calamitous affair, with Pat and Tiffany each showing off their quirks to this person hey just  met unabashedly. Pat goes to this somewhat dressy occasion wearing a Philadelphia Eagle jersey and demonstrates his obsession/infatuation with his ex-wife Nikki whom he deludedly thinks he is going to get back together with even though she has filed for divorce, moved away, and taken out a restraining order to keep him from getting to within 500 feet of her or contacting her in any way. Tiffany asks Pat about what meds he is taking and they proceed to have a jaw-dropping exchange about 3 or 4 psychoactive medications each has taken and their side effects while Ronnie and his wife look helplessly on. Once this conversation is over Tiffany abruptly gets up from the table and asks Pat to walk her home (even though they are barely into the salad course). While they are walking home she promptly propositions him for sex, which he refuses (because he is being loyal to his "relationship" with Nikki). These actions just reinforce that neither of them really has their self-destructive obsessive behaviors (sex addiction for her, delusion about his ex-wife for him) under control.

I wanted to give a short summary of some of the key events at the beginning of the film to give the reader a sense of how the movie introduces us to the characters and gets us intrigued and invested in their well-being. Even though I described them as "damaged" earlier, one of the key points of the film is that everyone in the film has something "not quite right" about their behavior, but it is only Pat and Tiffany who get the dreaded "crazy" label by everyone around them. But that doesn't mean that they don't have good qualities as well, i.e. a "silver lining."

Through an interesting (albeit somewhat contrived, plot device) Pat and Tiffany end up spending a lot of time together and the audience gets to see how good the two would be for each other long before either of the two characters realize it. The filmmakers can't disguise the fact that Cooper and  Lawrence really are incredibly attractive people, even if they are playing "regular" folks here who have disturbing personalities/behaviors. This fact makes watching the film an enjoyable exercise for people who appreciate male or female beauty (those eyes! that hair!). The main suspense of the film's plot is whether Pat and Tiffany can battle through their mental barriers to actually connect with each other. And by the end of the film, we really really care about what will happen to these characters.

Overall, Silver Linings Playbook is a heart-warming film, with extraordinary acting (the cast has the rare distinction of having Oscar nominations in all four acting categories for Cooper, Lawrence, De Niro and Weaver) and a thought-provoking script that will make you reassess your views about mental illness, the nature of "obsession" and love itself.

Title: Silver Linings Playbook.
Director: David O. Russell.
Running Time: 2 hours, 2 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated R for language and some sexual content/nudity.
Release Date: November 21, 2012.
Viewing Date: January 3, 2013.

Writing: A-.
Acting: A.
Visuals: B+.
Impact: A-.

Overall Grade: A (3.66/4.0).

Saturday, January 19, 2013

FILM REVIEW: Django Unchained


Quentin Tarantino is an infamous bad boy of Hollywood, with an unconventional and hyper-violent style that suffuses his films. He usually writes and directs his films and appears in them as an actor as well. He won an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay for Pulp Fiction in 1995 and Christoph Waltz won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor in 2010 for Inglourious Basterds.

Tarantino is also well-known as a huge student of film and an aficionado of various (often obscure) movie genres, which he often likes to re-interpret and combine in his creations.  Inglourious Basterds is both a revenge fantasy, a Holocaust film and a comedy. (See my review here.)

Ever since it was announced that Tarantino would be following up Basterds with a film about slavery called Django Unchained, fans of his work (including myself) have been highly anticipating the result. Tarantino has long been unafraid to confront race in his films, and non-white actors have often played important roles in his films. There were various rumors about who would play the title role of the ex-slave who carries the film and becomes partners with a foreign-born white bounty hunter who kills American white slaveowners. Various names like Idris Elba (Prometheus, Stringer Bell on The Wire), Will Smith (Men in Black) and Michael K. Williams (Omar on The Wire) were considered but Django was eventually played by Oscar-winner Jamie Foxx and a particularly villainous slaveowner was played by Leo Dicaprio.

Also appearing in the film are a nearly unrecognizable Samuel L. Jackson as a "House Slave" who closely identifies with his slaveowner named Calvin J. Candie played by Dicaprio, Kerry Washington as Django's wife named Broomhilda and Waltz as the central character of the German bounty hunter named Dr. King Schultz.

The story is set in the antebellum South where a German-born dentist (played with relish by Waltz) is making a living as a bounty hunter finding fugitives who are wanted "dead or alive." Since he finds slavery distasteful and treats black people as people and not property, Shultz usually kills the white slaveowners he finds. He connects with Django at the beginning of the film and enlists the slave for assistance in identifying and killing a trio of slaveowners called the Brittle brothers. Django is amazed one can get paid for killing white people and enthusiastically accepts an offer to join forces with Shultz as a bounty hunter ("Kill white people and they pay you for it? What's not to like?")

After an amusing and deadly encounter with the Ku Klux Klan (who are led by the unlikely comedy duo of Jonah Hill and Don Johnson) the two bounty hunters spend a winter together tracking, finding and killing white slaveowners and then Django wants to go rescue his wife from the Mississippi planation called CandieLand where she is located. Shultz realizes how dangerous this is and agrees to accompany Django on his quest to rescue Broomhilda, especially once he learns that she speaks his native language of German, which he has not heard in years and greatly misses.

I don't want to reveal any more of the plot but to say that the film does become a typical Tarantino bloodbath and there are very disturbing depictions of the inhumanity of slavery, especially various punishments such as a Black man being torn apart by dogs, attempted castration (that includes a quite memorable scene of full frontal nudity featuring Jamie Foxx) and a woman locked naked in a "hot box" buried six feet underground.

(A quick note to the potential viewer of the film: the word "nigger" is used almost continuously through the film. I lost track of how many times it is uttered by both black and white characters after counting about 50 occurrences. One thing I did notice about the word is that when it is pronounced with a Southern accent it sounds exactly like the "nigga" that appears in many rap songs. The fact that Tarantino is white and the creative force behind a film suffused with racist acts and dialogue has been a source of controversy.)

Overall, I think Django Unchained is more effective and rewarding an experience than Inglourious Basterds, although that may have more to do with the more intense emotional resonance I have with slavery than with the Holocaust. Both films are over-the-top, blood-soaked pulpy entertainments, but I connect with Tarantino's desire to address sensitive topics through genre films and believe he has done an excellent job. I look forward to seeing what his next film in this series.

Title: Django Unchained.
Director: Quentin Tarantino.
Running Time: 2 hours, 45 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated R for strong graphic violence throughout, a vicious fight, language and some nudity.
Release Date: December 25, 2012.
Viewing Date: December 28, 2012.

Writing: A.
Acting: A-.
Visuals: A.
Impact: A+.

Overall Grade: A (4.0/4.0).

LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin