I support:Jason Rosenbaum over at Calitics.com is not impressed:
1) Reducing costs and expanding coverage
2) Prohibiting the denial of insurance because of pre-existing conditions
3) Moving toward either a non-profit model of medical insurance or to one where premium costs can be controlled, either through competition in a public or cooperative model or through a regulated authority.
4) Assuring the financial survival of Medicare, because it is slated to run out of money in 2017.
5) Preventing the transfer of Medicaid costs to states, which could result in billions of dollars of additional loss to the State of California.
6) Establishing means testing for programs like Medicare Part D, which pays for prescription drugs
Clearly, the individual mandate - and how it is funded - is the critical, and as yet unanswered, question.
Feinstein wants to control costs? The Commonwealth Fund estimates a health reform bill with a public health insurance option will save an extra $2 trillion over 11 years.
Feinstein wants to expand coverage? Jacob Hacker argues [pdf] that the public health insurance option in conjunction with reform is the way to best provide expanded and quality coverage, while preserving choice.
Feinstein wants to stop insurance industry abuses? Then she'll have to help pass a law that mandates these things, because the insurance industry will never voluntarily accept these concessions, as their testimony before Congress made abundantly clear.
And Feinstein wants to save Medicare and Medicaid? Well, the only way to do that is to aggressively control costs, as Budget Director Peter Orszag points out, is to reform health care in a real way.
In short, if Senator Feinstein wants to achieve any of the goals she says she wants to achieve, she's going to need to support robust health reform, including the choice of a public health insurance option.
[...]
So keep calling her office at (202) 224-3841 and sign the petition and ask her to just come out and say it, "I'm with the President and commit to using all my muscle to pass real health care reform this year, including a choice of a public health insurance option, to achieve the goals I've laid out for our health care system."
I'll say it once again: Senator Feinstein can either make history, or stand in the way.
2 comments:
The big picture is that Feinstein must go. With exception to her environmental stands, she is a Republican. Iraq, Torture and Secret Prisons, FISA, The Fatherland oops, Homeland Security, Wireless wiretapping and Immunity to the Companies that spied... and now, real reform in Health Care.
She's big on saying "government", "options", and "in health care reform" in the same breath, but never consecutively! She panders, then votes as her contributors demand.
She's evil and has to go. Please badger your voting friends.
The big picture is that Feinstein must go. With exception to her environmental stands, she is a Republican. Iraq, Torture and Secret Prisons, FISA, The Fatherland oops, Homeland Security, Wireless wiretapping and Immunity to the Companies that spied... and now, real reform in Health Care.
She's big on saying "government", "options", and "in health care reform" in the same breath, but never consecutively! She panders, then votes as her contributors demand.
She's evil and has to go. Please badger your voting friends.
Post a Comment