Gordon Brown expressed Britain's concerns about the parliamentary bill when he met Yoweri Museveni, the veteran Ugandan president, at the Commonwealth heads of government meeting in Trinidad and Tobago. The suggested legislation would apply to sex between gay men or lesbian women in which one person has HIV. The bill also proposes the introduction of a three-year prison sentence for anyone who knows of the existence of a gay man or lesbian woman and fails to inform authorities in Uganda within 24 hours. The British prime minister's anger was echoed by his Canadian counterpart, Stephen Harper. Harper's spokesman, Dimitri Soudas, said: "If adopted, a bill further criminalising homosexuality would constitute a significant step backwards for the protection of human rights in Uganda."The proposed legislation includes the death penalty for "aggravated homosexuality." Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice and President Barack Obama have made no public comments on the legislation.
Uganda receives an estimated $287 million in U.S. taxpayer funds annually under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).
Rod 2.0 and other bloggers are asking whether those funds will be withheld if the legislation becomes law. The short answer from Eric Goosby, chief administrator of PEPFAR, is no.
This answer is unacceptable. To connect the anti-homosexuality legislation to the AIDS crisis in Uganda, which, like in the rest of Africa (and the world) is an overwhelmingly heterosexual phenomenon is shockingly ill-informed and borderline offensive.I'm very concerned about any decision that any country—including our own—would make to target a group that's in the population, and that's always been in the population, by excluding them from a service or passes legislation that criminalizes their behavior. Every time you do that, you push the behavior underground. It never works. Rather than minimizing the spread of the virus, it actually amplifies it.
The U.S. policy is trying to work with governments to say exactly that. I think I would do more harm than good by connecting our resources to respond to the epidemic to making them dependent on a behavior that they're not willing to engage in on their own. My role is to be supportive and helpful to the patients who need these services. It is not to tell a country how to put forward their legislation. But I will engage them in conversation around my concern and knowledge of what this is going to do to that population, and our ability to stop the movement of the virus into the general population.
Happy World AIDS Day!
1 comment:
I will have to agree with you sir. How foolish of him to say that. Those funds need to be withheld from those foolish negroes!
Post a Comment